¥Î¤F¦­¤Wªº®É¶¡¤]¤£À´¦^µªÁI»P¦s¦b¥D¸qªº°ÝÃD¡A°ß¦³§ì¦íÀY°Ý°Ý¨ä¥L¤H§a¡C
¤U¤È¤W¤F¨º­Ó¼s§i®MÀ¦¡ªº¹q¸£½Òµ{²¤¶¡A­n¬O¾Ç·|¡u§c¤H¡v¤]¤£¥Î³o¼Ë°µ¡C

³­¤Í¤H¦b¤Æ§©ªº©±¤¤¡A¦o¦b¸Õ²´·û¤ò²G¡B§ÚµL°Ê©ó°J¡A¥u·R¶å­»¤ô§a¡C
§Ú­nªº¤£¬O¬üÄRªº¦çªA¡AµØÄRªº¥´§ê¡A
¹ï§Ú¨Ó»¡¨S¦³·N¸q¡A§Ú¤£¦b·N§Úªº¼Ë¤l¬O¨º»òªºÁà­®¡A
µÛºòªº¬O¤º¦bªº´M§ä¡A°g½kªº®`©È¤H¥u·|¬O¬¡µÛ¨S¦³·N¸qªº¬¡°Ê¡A
¦ó¨Ó¤£¿ï¾Ü¦º¤`¡H²jª¾¦º¤]¦p¥Í¤@¼Ë­½µL·N¸q¡H
Ãø¹D§Ú­Ì¹Lªº¥Í¬¡¥»¬O¨S¦³·N¸q¡H¥u¬O¤@¹Î®ð¡H©Î¬O¤@ºØ«ººA¡H

³o¤@¨è¡A·Q±z¡A·Q±zªº¥Í¬¡¬O¦p¦¹¥­²Hªº´ç¹L¡C

Comment! (0) | Recommend!

¤µ¤Ñ¥u¤W¤@°ó¤§«á¥h¤F¦y¨F©C¹C³}¤@·|¡A¦b®Ñ¬[®³°_<<¤G¤Q¡B¤T¤Q¡B¥|¤Q>>¡A¤~ª¾¹D¹¢ºt¤p¼ä¨º­Ó¦n¤Íªº¤H¥s·¨´ð¡A¤W¬P´Á¤­§Ú«K¬O¦b°|¬Ý¨º®M¹q¼v¡A¦Ó¦Û¤v¬O³o»ò¦hªº³ßÅw¦o¡C°O±o³¯ªG«e°}¤l¤]¿ï¦o©ç«Å¶Çµu¤ù¡A³o¬O§Ú²Ä¤@¦¸¹ï¦o¦³¦L¶H¡AÁ`ı±o¦o¦³¦Û¤vªº­Ó©Ê¡A¤£¾å±o§Úªº·Pı¤]¬O¾Éºtªº·Pı¡A©Ò¥H§Ú«Ü³ßÅw¦o¹q¼v¤¤§êºtªº¨¤¦â¡C

Comment! (0) | Recommend!

¨S·Q¨ì¤µ¤Ñªº¤ñ¥ô¦ó¤@¤é§ó¤Ö¤H¤W°ó¡G
­õ¾Ç°ó«e­±¨º­Ó¨C¨Æ°Ýªº¤H®ø¥¢¡A¥t¥~¨º­Ó¶Â¤H¤]¤£¨£¤F¡C¤§«á¨ä«á¤W§O°ó¤]¬O¨º¼Ë¡A¦Û±q¹L¤F¨º­Ó¾Åª¶g«á¤@ª½«K¬O³o¼Ë¡C

«e´X¤ÑÄ~Äò·Q°ò·þ±Ðªº±Ð¸q¡A·Q¨ì¤Hªº­ì¸o½×¡Aµ²ªG¤µ¤Ñ«Kµ¹±Ð±Â»¡¤¤§Úªº·Qªk¡C
¦pªG¤H¤@¥X¥Í«K¦³¸o¡A§Ú«K¤£©ú¥Õ¬°¦ó­n¦³¤Hªº¦s¦b¡G¦s¦b¦p­WÃø¡A«o¥H¸o¦W§@±»¹¢...

Comment! (0) | Recommend!

Once a jolly friar got himself an argument
And coyldn't get out of his mind
He thought that he could prove the existence of the Diety
Because of the way that the words are defined

Thus spake of St.Anselm, thus spake St.Anselm
Thus the spake of St. Anselm, who now is long dead
And we're awed as we read his proof so ontological;
who can dely the word that he said?

If that than which nothing greater canb be conceived
Can be conceive not to exist,
Then 'tis not that than which nothing greater can be conceieve
THis is unquestionable , I insist

For in that case a being greater can be conceived
whose major traits we can easily list:
Namely, that than which nothing greater can be conceive
And which cannnot be conceieved not to exist

For if that than which nothing greater can be conceived
Has no existence outside of man's mind,
Then 'tis not that than which nothing greater can be conceived,
Due to the way that the words are defined

For in that case a greater can be conceived
(This is of course analytically true)
Namely , that thhan whoch nothing greater can be conceived
And which nothing greater can be conceived
And which exists in reality too!

Thus spake of St. Anselm, thus spake of St.Anselm
Thus spake of St Anselm with weighty intent,
And we're awed as we read his proof so ontological
Would that we could understand what it meant

Comment! (1) | Recommend!

¤µ¤Ñ¥u¤W¨â¬ì¡G
¨S¦³¼BªQ¤¯ªº¤é¤l¡A§Ú­Ì¦P¾Ç³sÁn¥s´e¡B¼o¡C
¨ä¹ê¥t¤@­Ó±Ð±Â±Â½Òªº¤º®e¬O¨S¦³°ÝÃDªº¡A³ÌµL©`¬O¥LªºÁn½u»y®ð¡A¨º«K¯uªº¥i¥s¤H¨«°ó¡C§Ú¥u·Q¥L§ÖÂIµ¹§Ú­Ì½×¤åÃD¥Ø¡A¤£¨äµM«K¤£°÷®É¶¡§ä¸ê®Æ¼g¡C¤@¶ò½k¶î¡C

ÃÀ³N½Ò¨S¦³Thomas ªº¤é¤l¤]¦n¹Lªº¡A¥u¬O¤W°ó«á¦^®a®É°Ý¦Û¤v'beauty'»P'aesthetics'
ªº®É­Ô¡AÀ~¤F¤@¸õ¡AÁÙ¬O¤U°ó°ÝMiss Wong§a¡C

¤¤¤È®É¦³¦P¾Ç¦V§Ú¶Ç¹D¡A¦o¦V§Ú»¡¤H¦º«á¤£«H¥D¤@©w­n¤U¦aº»¡A
¦pªG§Ú¬Û«H¦oªº'¹D'¡A¨º§Ú§ó¥['¬Ã±¤' ¡G¥Í¡A·Q·Q¤U¥h¡Aı±o¦b¨º¹D¡A
¦pªG¯«·R¤H¡A¬°¤°»òÍ¢¤S­n§â¦º«áªº¤H©ñ¤J'¦aº»'---³Q«ü¬Oµh­Wªº¦a¤è¡H
¨º»ò¯«ªº·R¤£¬OµL¨pªº¶Ü¡H¬O§_¦]¬°¦b'¯«'ªº²´¤¤¬Ý¤H¦º«á¨­¥÷¦³§O¡H¶Ç¹Dªº¥L­Ì¤S»¡§Ú¬O¬O¤H¡A¤£¬O¯«¡A¯«ªº·N§Ú­Ì¬O¤£©ú¥Õªº¡C
·Q°_ªü·í©M®L«½¦Y¤Fµ½´c¾ðªºªG¹êªº¨Æ...¦A·Q¤U¥h¶Ã¤F¡A·Q°_¨º­ÓSt. Anselm¨º­Ó¯«¦s¦bªº½×..........

Comment! (2) | Recommend!

¦¬¨ì¨â¬ì¦Ò¸Õªº¦¨ÁZ¡AÁÙ¥i¥Hªº¡A¦]¬°§Ú¥H¬°¦Ò±o«Ü®t«lªº¡C
§Ú·Q§Ú¥i¥H°µ±o§ó¥[¦nªº¡C

¤µ¤Ñ¦³ÂI²ÖÃaªº·Pı¡C

«á°O¡G©Msam ¦Y¤È¶ºªº·Pı¬O¤£¿ù¡C
«B¤¤ªº±ß¤W¡A¥u·Q°_¥L¡C³Ì«á¤°»ò¤]°µ¤£¨Ó¡C

Comment! (0) | Recommend!