During a recent (extended) family dinner I got into quite a heated debate with my relatives over the whole Roy case - I must have shocked them a little given they have never really heard me speak in English at all for the past two decades. I guess at the end of the day there are many misconceptions around - i.e. about the purpose of letters of demand, playing your cards right and holding them tightly to your chest in our adversarial system, divorcing questions of law from politics, emotions from logic. Many tend to conflate everything together and seek an easy target to dump all their pent-up frustrations on. Who can claim to speak for the majority? Not me, definitely not TRS, and not random assorted online commentators either. Is the 5000-strong return my CPF protest indicative of the wishes of the majority? I don't really think so.

There is a lot of misinformation and disinformation going about online. I saw that someone on my news feed was constantly sharing TRS links. He was promptly deleted after I grew tired of the shit that site was producing (not that I knew him personally anyway).

Sorry, you do not have permission to comment.

If you are a member, try logging in again or accessing this page here.