Far from the depths of night
Whispering days shouting in fear of darkness
Lengthening shadows of a quivering man lying all alone
As void as an orbital circle of no return
Begging mercy in voices of no cheers and tears
The man standing in a world of nothingness
As if no breath to expire for eternity
Still the guiseless man seeking no solace
From the very beneath of his soulless shadows
A tearing silence breaking asunder all the while
The emptiness of the surrounding chasing him
Chasing him like piercing arrows in muffled voices
His days and nights echoing only the lapses of moments
As if no more pangs of faith dropping dead
In humane beliefs from the ancint empire of weal and woes
No more sounds of existing conscience widening
Nor carrying the corpses of the man's dying soliloquy
As if the man twice dead among the burgeoning woods...
Who is the man drowning himself in his own shadows
Who is the man staring vacantly in disbelief
Is it me who has emptied himself of all burdens
Is it me who has buried his treasury of angst of truth?
Still the man breathing in his shallow depth
As if the world has emptied his silence on the grave.

Comment! (0) | Recommend! | Categories: Poetry [t]

All have gone to the war
To fight a cruel law of science
They will bring whole lot of fortune
When they will hoist a manifesto of a newer world.

They will write a new history of science
They will sing songs of human predictability
As they will burn all those shackles of history.

Comment! (0) | Recommend! | Categories: Poetry [t]

Inustrialisation in its process has pauperised the mass of people and degraded the environment. Lewis Muford has observed in his 'City in History' : "Just as early industrialism had squeezed its profits not merely out of the machine, but out of the pauperism of the workers. So the crude factory town had maintained its low wages and taxes by depleting and pauperizing the environment.

Hygiene demanded space and municipal equipment and natural resorces that had hitherto been lacking. In time, this demand forced municipal socialzation, as a normal accomaniment to improved service. Neither a pure water supply, nor the collective disposal of garbage, waste, and sewage, could be left to the the private conscience or attended to only if they could be provided for a profit..."

The main contention of Mumford was that pauperization of the environment was solely due to privatization of the cities in a state of profit earning tendency in the social economy. In this perspective Beatrice and Sidney Webb propounded the idea of 'municipal socilism' involving the people collectively to cater to the new demands arising out of industrialization and urbanization in the process.

Comment! (0) | Recommend! | Categories: Opinion [t]

The contention of right to food security to protect the farmers has been doing the round in the centre stage of world trade talks for sometime now. The contention is whether developing countries are entitled to enjoy the right and in that regard whether those countries would be allowed cheaper imports that is likely to overwhelm local agriculture when the farmers' livelihood and food security are most important than the so-called free trade or 'market access'

This controversy has been raging the WTO. This issue is being challenged by the US which does not want a want a brake to be on its farm products which are heavily subsidized and thus 'artificially' cheap. No doubt, it is a big issue because the fate of hundreds of millions of farmers is going to hang in balance. Countries like Indonesia, Phiilipines, Ghana, Senegal and the Caribbean region where cheap and often subsidized food are dumped by the US, Thiland etc. have already raised their voices.

Developing countries want to be able to designate 20% of their agricultural imports as 'special products'(SP) which will be subject to no or very low tariff reduction as a measure. These are products designated as food security, farmers' livelihoods and rural develpoment. They also propose a 'special safeguard mechanism'(SSM) to allow the developing countries to impose higher duty on some imports in case of an increase in volume and fall in price which are likely to put pressure on the local production.

The SP and SSM have already been reached a deala few years ago. The question is how to get them implemented.

Comment! (0) | Recommend! | Categories: Opinion [t]

Your blessed tongue will never be blemished
Your feet will never stop dancing
The high sky painting the brighter sun
The misty veil has crossed the road.

You sing like a twilight delight
You dance over the vast peninsula
You will never leave your love for destiny.

Comment! (1) | Recommend! | Categories: Poetry [t]

During the rising years of Industrial Revolution, Marx thought of the adverse consequences it was supposed to wreak upon the nature and the human world. He was of the opinion that that not only labour but nature too was at a stake by the impact of capital. Capital subjugates both labour and nature. At the same time, it separates town and country and employs more and more industrial techniques in production.

As a result, it paves all the way for outright degredation of the ecological basis of the living world and human existence in particular. He says in Capital Vol.I : "All progress in capital agriculture is a progress in the art, not only of robbing the worker, but of robbing the soil; all progress in increasing the fertility of the soil for a given time is progress towards ruining the long-lasting sources of that fertility."

It seems how far a great man's idea goes to predict the future. He also says ; "The more a country proceeds from the large-scale industry as the backgroun of its development, as in the case of the United States, the more rapid is this progress of destruction. Capitalist production, therefore, only develops the techniques and the degree of the combination of the social process of production by simul taneously undermining the original sources of all wealth...the soil and the worker." How true it can be! Is marx the first environmentalist and ecologist of the? If we say yes, it is no economy of truth and far from the truth we know today.

Comment! (0) | Recommend! | Categories: Opinion [t]